The chart above is a chart of MTL. We were in and out of it when it was trading within its channel, but sold it when it broke through the bottom of its channel and simultaneously took out its 100dma. Now that its 100dma is starting to slope down, we have a stock that is trading below its downtrending moving average... the very definition of a downtrend. This stock will continue going lower until it hits $0, or unexpected industry-specific news turns it around.
It doesn't look good for MTL. This doesn't mean it won't have relief rallies along the way. It just means that it is now in a downtrend, and there is no reason to think it will perform any better than CROX or BCSI for the forseeable future.
This brings us to a more important issue... fertilizer. There are many signs of weakness in the commodities market. MTL is a steel company, and we see weakness there. OIL is a commodity and there is an obvious recent downturn there (break of trend channel, break of moving average). It has always bothered us that the fertilizer stocks trade like commodities. We much prefer the days of buying and selling DELL, AOL, AMZN and GOOG, where at least the number of variables affecting the stock's price was manageable. With these fertilizer stocks, we feel somewhat at the mercy of an uncontrollable commodities market.
So how is this post about canaries? Back in the day (before carbon monoxide detectors), miners would bring canaries in cages into the coalmines. The small birds were sensitive to even trace amounts of deadly gases, and would quickly die if exposed to them. If the birds died, the miners knew that they themselves should exit the mine. We use this analogy to describe stocks because there are strong stocks (the miners), and weak stocks (the canaries), in the same sector. When you start to see the weaker stocks break down, you know it's time to sell the stronger stocks because it won't be long before they succomb to the weakness.
Right now, with commodities breaking down, we are being given early warning about the fertilizer names. This is why you want to stick with best of breed, and always buy low. Investors in MON (a weak fertilizer stock), are more vulnerable than investors in POT (a strong fertilizer stock). MON is breaking down more and more each day. It has already broken the bottom of its channel and its moving average. It is our canary in the coalmine.
So does this mean the fertilizer trade is dead? It may be on the brink of complete failure, but we're sticking with it. Here's why...
First, not all of the fertilizer stocks have broken down. POT, CF and AGU remain strong. MOS is weak, but is staying within its channel nonetheless.
Second, the fertilizer stocks report earnings next week. This is a big shot in the arm for them. It's what pulled them out of their slump in early April.
Third, this market is rotational. The money has moved out of commodities and into financials and homebuilders for now, but that will come full circle at some point. Citigroup has rallied from $14 to $20 over the past 3 days. Would you buy it here? At some point, the rotation will draw money from the financial names and it will be looking for somewhere to go. When money needs somewhere to go, it usually finds it way into the familiar rather than uncharted waters. This psychology is what creates overall trends in the first place.
Fourth, the valuations of these stocks are very reasonable. We understand why an Amazon or a Yahoo at a p/e of 120 finally reaches a point where its valuation outstrips its earnings potential. But in fertilizer, we have p/e's of 10 to 20, well within standard range for the S&P500.
Fifth, it is often a confluence of events that triggers a large move in a stock's price, with a single event acting as the sole catalyst to spark the move. With the fertilizers, we have extremely popular, strong stocks with stellar earnings that have just corrected significantly. All they need is a catalyst. Next week's earnings are the perfect excuse from which to launch a very profitable rally. This is in keeping with our theory that beaten up stocks respond positively to earnings reports and overvalued stocks respond negatively to them, almost regardless of the contents of the reports themselves. We said we would have an opinion on how these stocks would react to earnings as they get closer to their release dates. We are definitely leaning toward a positive reaction to earnings considering how much they've dropped ahead of them. We still have a few days before earnings, but it looks like they'll remain under pressure until they are released.
So what are we doing now? We are a decisive group of traders, for better or worse. We've made the decision to stick with the fertilizer trade (despite some canaries dropping dead), until earnings are released next week. We will have a better idea about their future once we see their reaction to these reports. In the spirit of sticking with our trade, we are actually buying more into this drop. We added some MOS today at 127, bringing our total stake in fertilizers to 64% of our portfolio. The rest is currently either in cash, DDM, and SMN.
We do not recommend people follow us blindly into this trade. It is a high-risk proposition and we are particularly skilled at damage control should things go wrong. Do your own homework, and make your own investment decisions.
15 comments:
I know why fertilizers are down today: I just bought 200 more AGU. So they just might decide to break out of their channels just to spite me. But I'm really not concerned yet. These stocks have been following a tick tock cycle for months. On in april, off in may, on in june, off in july. Should rally by mid august. In the meantime my SOL has taken up the slack.
Here's some more food for thought. Take any of the big Fertilizer stocks. MOS, CF, POT, etc. If you look closely at the pattern of the last 3 rallies, they are nearly identical. It hits a new record high, then rolls slightly downhill for one month and one week. Then it hits a new record high, then rolls slightly downhill for one month and one week. (It is uncanny...) Well, we are one month into the downhill roll. Which means we have a week left. If history repeats itself, the next rally will begin after the end of next week. Coincidentally, right when earnings are released. Now is not only the time to buy, but it's the time to be looking at August calls.
or not... :)
Respectfully disagree Snot, Ag is going down, just like you hypothesize w/ MTL. I will be adding to my SMN position on any Ag rallies into earnings.
vitalinvestors i strongly disagree with you. I am starting to see the ownership data for some of these Ag companies as of 6/30 and there has been no selling but instead more accumulating. For example CF is still virtually 100% institution owned. Now why would they want to let the rally cease here? Plus a lot of the emerging markets are still facing fertilizer shortages. There's only so much land to feed an ever growing population. I would love to hear your reason for thinking these stocks wont rally.
Snot, once again thanks for your analogies. Put things in perspective.
- G
POT has now decisively breeched its 50DMA, the 200DMA rests some 50points lower. Sure, the world needs food and oil and steel, with a growing population all the longer term trends are positive, yet steel and oil are "breaking down", what makes you think the same thing cannot happen to the AGs? POT has rallied from 80 to 220in a year, that kind of appreciation is simply not sustainable without a pullback to test support levels at some point - I am betting that happens now.
POT = 100MA
POT's next support at 100 MA.
Yes, I would be much more comfortable buying at or near the 100DMA around 195 for a bounce rather than no mans land between support levels
Dear Anon, what do you make of MOS trading at $127, a sliver away from its 100DMA at $125.50, after decisively breaking its 50DMA at $136? Will MOS bounce off the 100DMA or move lower to the 200DMA at $103? SMN at $34.50 looks pretty good here, having broken through its 50 and 100DMAs, a test of the 200DMA at $38 looks probable.
With all due respect to Snot who has made some great calls on the Ags, even he acknowledges the fertilizer play is quite risky here.
I would say, Ag is still a great buy for a long term. AGU can see 140-150 by the year end. Ofcourse, it would be an absolute jackpot is you manage to pick it up at 80 or so. I may get there, or not. So the best is to start scaling in every 10 points or so and unload some SMN on that rainy day.
For the short term, I believe the DDM/SSO/QLD and leaders like aapl all look nice and ready for a bounce with the market.
The P/E of MTL is 16.4 and the forward P/E is a mere 7.3. If that canary has died . . . ?
MTL is another story:
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page39?oid=56949&sn=Detail
Btw its operational results for the 2008 first six months I think very good:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080717/3702442en_public.html?.v=1
Thanks to all of you for the very interesting differing points of view. The only thing we caution about is using the 50dma just because it's widely used. Most of these stocks have broken the 50dma many times in the past 6 months, making their current break of it insignificant. We try to find a moving average that just touches a stock's lows over the course of its uptrend, and use that moving average regardless of how awkward a number it is. For example, CF has bounced off if its 137dma once in Jan and once in April. Both of those dips represented awesome buying opportunites. Why, if CF drops to its 137dma some 19 points lower at 130, would this time be any different? Surely if CF dropped 19 points, people would all be claiming that the Ag trade is dead. But technically, CF could drop 19 points (intraday), and still be in play.
The canary didn't die. It was just taking a nap. It is now singing a sweet, sweet song: "Money, money, money. It's a rich man's world."
Post a Comment