Gary the chimp is doing a lot better than we are. He's up 5.2% as of the close today, compared with a loss of 8.0% for the S&P500 index. It's been 2 months since Gary chose his portfolio by throwing darts at 5 uptrending charts and 5 downtrending charts. Over the same time period, Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is down 19.4%, Icahn's MOT is down 18.6%, Kerkorian's MGM is down 26.1%, and Adelson's LVS is down 63%.
Gary's performance continues to improve as time goes by because more and more of his charts are showing their true colors. The beginning was rocky for his portfolio, as many of the stocks were bought at short term inopportune times. But now with two months of momentum, Gary's underlying thesis that an object in motion remains in motion is being proven correct.
If we can prove (in real time) this simple concept on a little blog like this, then the burning question is why don't the pros know this? Buffett bought GS at 120 or so, and GE at 25. Gary would have shorted both of those charts.
Speaking of GS, it looks as if it is breaking through the top of its ascending triangle, which bodes well for the market as a whole.
We'll have to see how long Gary continues to outperform the market. His approach likely has a shelf life, as no chart goes in one direction for too long without reversing. The chart above is of EBS, one of Gary's longs. Even though his performance is impressive (leaving his more intelligent human peers in the dust), it must be understood that his performance will always be better relative to the market during bad times. In good times, Gary will still profit, but will underperform the market. He is most likely to make about 1% to 2% a month over the long run, regardless of what the indexes do. His approach is well suited for those who chose to accept a somewhat muted return during bull markets in return for far less anxious times during bear markets. We're hoping Gary can continue to maintain his current 2.5% monthly profit, which would give him a 30% yearly gain. It sounds too ambitious, considering this would mean his account would triple in value every 3 years.
Regardless of whether he makes 10% or 30% a year, your money would be far safer invested with this chimp than with Bernard Madoff. In a nutshell, this one statement sums up the reality of Wall Street, the scam that is the backbone of our financial system. Last we heard, Madoff may get the most severe punishment the SEC can give him... a very hard slap on the wrist accompanied by a $75 fine. He may also have to apologize to those he scammed. Surely this severe treatment will send a message to future scammers and make Wall Street a safer place for our grandchildren to invest their life savings.
5 comments:
I completely agree. Christopher Cox is a eunich. Did you see he said in an interview a few days ago that his biggest regret is that he allowed the three week short sale ban to happen? Why didn't he just reinstate the uptick rule? Sure seems like common sense to me.
Here's to wishing everyone a much much much much much better and more profitable New Year!!!!
May 2009 be utterly divine for all our portfolios!
Paulson is an archcriminal. He is the one who ordered the short selling ban, which destroyed the market more than any other single act. Paulson is a representative of GS. Since archcriminal Paulson will most likely never be prosecuted, GS stands to gain handsomely. What surprises me is that their stock isnt up more.
This could be a nice little short covering rally today. Did you all know that according to I.R.S. regulations if you carry a short position into the New Year that you owe short term capital gains taxes on the VALUE of the ENTIRE POSITION? Whether you are up, down or sideways doesn't matter, you will owe taxes on the amount it would have cost you to cover your position at market close 12/31/2008. Something to keep in mind because a person could really get hurt by that rule.
Article on Billionaires that lost big in 2008, including Mr. Dickshit, who founded PartyPoker, an online gaming site whose employees were cheating gamers by rigging the decks in their own favor...
http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/106352/Billionaire-Blowups-of-2008
If I was a billionaire and my last name was Dickshit I think the first thing I'd splurge on is the cost to legally change my last name!
Post a Comment